Skip to content

Network Security Assessment Runbook

A professional network security assessment is not just a review of firewall rules. It is a structured evaluation of architecture, exposure, trust, access paths, monitoring, and operational risk across the entire network.

Welcome to the Network Security Assessment Runbook.

This runbook brings together the practical skills from:

  • Network Security Fundamentals Lab
  • ACL Security Lab
  • Firewall Security Lab
  • VPN Security Lab
  • Network Threat Investigation Lab

The objective is to move from:

I can configure network-security controls.

to:

I can assess an unfamiliar network, identify meaningful security weaknesses, prioritize risk, and present clear remediation to both technical teams and management.

This runbook is especially relevant for:

  • Network Security Engineers
  • Security Consultants
  • Firewall Engineers
  • SOC Analysts
  • Infrastructure Security Engineers
  • Security Architects
Item Details
Runbook Network Security Assessment
Difficulty Intermediate β†’ Advanced
Estimated Time 3–8 Hours depending on scope
Primary Focus Network Architecture, Exposure, Segmentation & Control Review
Target Roles Network Security Engineer, Security Consultant, Security Architect
Certification Alignment CCNA, CCNP Security
Output Assessment Report, Findings Register, Risk Ratings, Remediation Roadmap

You have been given approved review access to an enterprise network.

The environment contains:

  • user VLANs
  • server VLANs
  • database networks
  • management networks
  • internet-facing services
  • firewalls
  • routers
  • switches
  • VPN connectivity
  • remote users
  • DNS infrastructure
  • logging and monitoring

Management asks:

How secure is our network, where are the biggest risks, and what should we fix first?

Your job is not to simply collect configurations.

You need to answer:

What Exists?
↓
How Is It Connected?
↓
Which Trust Relationships Exist?
↓
Which Traffic Is Allowed?
↓
Which Systems Are Exposed?
↓
Which Controls Protect Them?
↓
Can Suspicious Activity Be Detected?
↓
Which Weaknesses Matter Most?

By the end of this runbook, you should be able to:

  • define assessment scope

  • understand network architecture

  • inventory network assets

  • review IP addressing and subnets

  • identify trust boundaries

  • evaluate segmentation

  • review ACLs

  • assess firewall policy

  • identify public exposure

  • review management-plane security

  • assess VPN architecture

  • review remote-access security

  • inspect routing and NAT

  • review DNS and network services

  • assess logging and monitoring

  • identify security findings

  • rate findings consistently

  • create a remediation roadmap

  • produce technical and executive reports

Before beginning, confirm:

  • sites in scope

  • networks in scope

  • devices in scope

  • production vs non-production

  • VPNs in scope

  • internet edge in scope

  • wireless in scope if applicable

  • whether configuration changes are permitted

  • whether testing is passive or active

  • evidence-handling requirements

Do not:

  • alter firewall policies

  • shut interfaces

  • change routes

  • modify VPNs

  • run disruptive scans

unless explicitly authorized.

Use:

Scope
↓
Discover
↓
Map Architecture
↓
Inventory Assets
↓
Identify Trust Boundaries
↓
Review Exposure
↓
Review Segmentation
↓
Review ACLs
↓
Review Firewalls
↓
Review VPNs
↓
Review Routing / NAT
↓
Review Network Services
↓
Review Monitoring
↓
Create Findings
↓
Prioritize Risk
↓
Build Remediation Roadmap
↓
Report

Document:

  • sites

  • offices

  • data centers

  • cloud-connected networks

  • firewalls

  • routers

  • core switches

  • access switches

  • VPN gateways

  • critical applications

  • internet-facing systems

Item Details
Organization
Primary Site
Branch Sites
Internet Edge
VPN Infrastructure
Critical Networks
Critical Applications
Assessment Owner
Technical Contact
Assessment Date

Without clear scope, you may:

  • miss a branch connection

  • overlook a management network

  • misinterpret risk

  • review incomplete firewall policy

Request available:

  • network diagrams

  • IP address plans

  • VLAN lists

  • firewall rule exports

  • router configurations

  • VPN documentation

  • asset inventories

  • change records

  • security standards

Documentation may be:

  • incomplete

  • outdated

  • inconsistent with actual configuration

Treat it as a starting point.

Create a high-level diagram.

Example:

Internet
↓
Edge Router
↓
Firewall
↓
DMZ
↓
Core Network
β”œβ”€β”€ User VLANs
β”œβ”€β”€ Application VLANs
β”œβ”€β”€ Database VLANs
└── Management VLAN

Add:

  • branch offices

  • VPN tunnels

  • cloud connections

  • security services

Ask:

Where are the trust boundaries?

Create:

Device Type Location Management IP Criticality

Include:

  • routers

  • switches

  • firewalls

  • VPN gateways

  • wireless controllers

  • load balancers where relevant

Every important device should have:

  • technical owner

  • business/service owner where relevant

  • support team

Critical Firewall
↓
No Clear Owner

creates operational and security risk.

Create:

VLAN Network Purpose Trust Level Owner

Classify:

  • user

  • application

  • database

  • management

  • guest

  • DMZ

  • security

  • voice

  • infrastructure

Ask:

Why does this network exist, and which other networks should it communicate with?

Assess:

  • network ranges

  • overlapping networks

  • inconsistent subnet design

  • undocumented ranges

Poor IP planning can make:

  • segmentation

  • firewall policy

  • incident response

  • routing

more difficult.

List:

  • authentication services

  • database systems

  • finance systems

  • security tools

  • backup infrastructure

  • network management systems

Create:

Asset Network Criticality Exposure

Classify zones such as:

Internet
DMZ
User
Application
Database
Management
Guest
Partner
Remote Access

Internal does not automatically mean:

trusted.

Create:

Source Zone Destination Zone Expected Trust
Internet DMZ Low
User Application Controlled
User Database Normally Restricted
Management Infrastructure Privileged
Guest Internal Restricted

For important applications:

Source Destination Protocol/Service Required? Owner
Users Web App HTTPS Yes App Team
Users DB SQL No
App DB DB Service Yes App Team

Security policy should match business requirements.

Look for paths such as:

Users
↓
Database

or:

Development
↓
Production Management

without clear business need.

Finding ID:
NET-001
Title:
User Network Has Direct Access to Sensitive Database Network
Severity:
High
Observation:
General user systems can directly communicate with sensitive database services.
Risk:
Compromise of an employee endpoint could provide a direct attack path toward critical data systems.
Recommendation:
Restrict user-to-database communication and require access through approved application tiers.

Assess whether the architecture separates:

  • users

  • servers

  • databases

  • management

  • guest access

  • internet-facing workloads

Ask:

If this network is compromised, what can the attacker reach next?

East-west traffic means internal-to-internal communication.

Look for:

  • broad server-to-server access

  • unnecessary admin protocols

  • unrestricted user-to-server paths

Segmentation should reduce lateral movement.

North-south traffic generally involves:

  • internet ↔ internal

  • remote access ↔ internal

  • partner ↔ internal

Review:

  • exposed services

  • firewall control

  • logging

  • authentication

Create:

Public IP/Service Internal Resource Port Required? Owner

Review carefully:

  • SSH

  • RDP

  • databases

  • management consoles

  • VPN portals

Ask:

Can internet hosts directly reach administrative interfaces?

Examples:

Internet
↓
SSH
↓
Server

or:

Internet
↓
Firewall Management
Finding ID:
NET-002
Title:
Administrative Service Exposed to the Internet
Severity:
High
Risk:
Attackers can directly target administrative authentication and exposed management services.
Recommendation:
Restrict administrative access to approved private or controlled management paths.

Assess:

  • standard ACLs

  • extended ACLs

  • source ranges

  • destination ranges

  • protocol

  • port

  • placement

  • direction

  • rule order

For every permit ask:

Can this access be made narrower?

Look for:

permit ip any any

or broad subnet-to-subnet access.

Finding ID:
ACL-001
Title:
Overly Broad ACL Permits Unrestricted Inter-Network Traffic
Severity:
High
Risk:
The rule weakens segmentation and may enable lateral movement.
Recommendation:
Replace broad access with application-specific source, destination, and service rules.

Determine:

  • interface

  • inbound/outbound

  • whether intended traffic actually crosses the ACL

Identify cases where:

Broad Permit
↓
Specific Deny

makes the deny ineffective.

Look for:

  • migration rules

  • vendor rules

  • troubleshooting rules

Ask:

Is this still required?

Identify:

  • perimeter firewalls

  • internal segmentation firewalls

  • cloud firewalls if relevant

  • branch firewalls

Ask:

Is firewall placement aligned with the organization’s trust boundaries?

Document:

Firewall Zone Purpose

Typical zones:

  • outside

  • DMZ

  • inside

  • management

  • partner

For every important rule inspect:

  • source

  • destination

  • service

  • action

  • logging

  • owner

  • last review

Rule Source Destination Service Owner Required?

Review:

ANY
↓
ANY
↓
ANY
↓
ALLOW

These should receive high scrutiny.

A DMZ workload should generally have limited internal access.

Review:

Internet
↓
DMZ Web
↓
Required App Service

and not:

DMZ
↓
Entire Internal Network

Determine:

  • which networks can reach databases

  • which ports

  • whether admin access is isolated

Databases should normally be reachable only from:

  • approved applications

  • approved administration paths

Do not ignore egress.

Check whether sensitive systems have:

ANY β†’ Internet

Ask:

Why does this server require unrestricted internet access?

Document:

Original Translated Direction Business Purpose

Review:

  • inbound publishing

  • source NAT

  • destination NAT

  • PAT

NAT does not replace firewall policy.

Important rules should provide usable logs.

Review whether logs contain:

  • source

  • destination

  • service

  • action

  • timestamp

  • policy name

Every important rule should ideally have:

  • owner

  • business justification

  • review date

Ask:

When were firewall rules last reviewed?

Identify:

  • stale rules

  • expired projects

  • old vendors

  • decommissioned systems

Look for rules that never match because broader rules exist above them.

Shadowed rules indicate poor policy quality and may hide security intent.

Identify how administrators access:

  • routers

  • switches

  • firewalls

  • VPN gateways

  • network controllers

Administrator
↓
Management Network
↓
Network Device

Prefer secure protocols.

Review for:

  • SSH

  • HTTPS

  • secure APIs

and identify insecure legacy management where applicable.

Assess:

Authentication
Authorization
Accounting

Ask:

  • are individual administrator accounts used?

  • is access centrally managed?

  • are actions logged?

Shared admin accounts reduce accountability.

Document:

  • where used

  • why

  • alternatives

Determine which networks can reach device-management interfaces.

General user networks should not normally provide unrestricted administrative reachability.

Inventory:

  • site-to-site VPNs

  • remote-access VPNs

  • partner VPNs

  • vendor VPNs

Create:

Local Site Remote Site Networks Business Purpose

Ask:

Does the tunnel include more networks than the business requires?

Assess:

  • user authentication

  • MFA

  • user groups

  • assigned networks

  • allowed resources

  • session logging

Avoid:

Remote User
↓
Entire Enterprise

Prefer:

Remote User
↓
Required Business Applications

For each vendor:

Vendor Owner Resource Expiry MFA

Third-party access without:

  • expiry

  • ownership

  • monitoring

should be prioritized.

Determine:

  • split or full tunnel

  • business justification

  • security controls

  • endpoint posture

  • monitoring implications

Confirm the ability to answer:

  • who connected?

  • from where?

  • when?

  • how long?

  • successful/failed?

  • which group?

Look for patterns such as:

Same Source
↓
Many Users
↓
Repeated Failures

which may indicate password spraying.

Document:

  • static routes

  • dynamic routing

  • default routes

  • branch routes

  • internet routes

Ask:

Could a route provide an unexpected path around a security control?

Identify which systems use:

0.0.0.0/0

and where that traffic goes.

Traffic may fail or bypass expected controls if:

  • outbound and return paths differ

depending on architecture.

Confirm that sensitive paths cannot bypass:

  • firewall

  • ACL

  • inspection

Map:

Internal Address
↓
Translation
↓
External Address

and public service publishing.

Inventory:

  • internal DNS

  • external DNS

  • forwarders

  • resolvers

Ask:

Which systems are allowed to resolve external domains, and where is DNS activity logged?

Look for endpoints using external DNS directly instead of approved resolvers.

Central DNS improves:

  • policy

  • monitoring

  • threat investigation

Assess:

  • authorized DHCP

  • scope design

  • network ownership

Network devices should have consistent time.

Without accurate time:

event correlation becomes unreliable.

Determine whether network devices send logs to centralized monitoring.

Identify tools receiving:

  • firewall

  • router

  • switch

  • VPN

  • DNS

  • IDS/IPS logs

Ask:

If a network incident occurred yesterday, could the team reconstruct it today?

Assess whether retention supports:

  • incident investigation

  • compliance

  • threat hunting

Where present, document:

  • placement

  • inspection scope

  • alert ownership

  • tuning

Ask:

Which high-risk network activity currently has no detection?

Look for detections covering:

  • port scanning

  • brute force

  • password spray

  • suspicious VPN activity

  • lateral movement

  • unusual outbound connections

Determine whether security teams experience:

  • excessive false positives

  • noisy firewall alerts

  • ignored network detections

More alerts do not automatically mean better security.

Assess whether network changes follow:

Request
↓
Review
↓
Approval
↓
Implementation
↓
Validation
↓
Rollback Capability

Ask how emergency network changes are:

  • approved

  • documented

  • reviewed afterward

Critical network-device configurations should have:

  • backups

  • controlled storage

  • recovery process

Assess:

  • software versions

  • patching

  • unsupported devices

  • security advisories

Identify unnecessary network-device services.

Disable:

what the device does not need.

Where relevant, consider:

  • data center access

  • console access

  • device tampering risk

Example:

Internet
β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€ Public Web :443
β”œβ”€β”€ VPN Gateway
β”œβ”€β”€ SSH :22 ← Review
└── Firewall Admin ← High Risk

Example:

User Endpoint
↓
Application
↓
Database
User ─Xβ†’ Management

Ask:

If this user workstation is compromised, what is the highest-value system an attacker could reach?

Create:

Asset Exposure Service Required? Risk
Source Device Protocol Allowed? Required?
User/Group Destination Service Required?
Source Destination Service Required? Control

Use:

Condition
+
Evidence
+
Network Path
+
Risk
+
Business Impact
+
Recommendation
Finding ID:
Title:
Severity:
Affected Device / Network:
Observation:
Evidence:
Attack Path:
Risk:
Business Impact:
Recommendation:
Validation:
Finding ID:
NSA-001
Title:
User Network Has Broad Access to Server Networks
Severity:
High
Observation:
General user endpoints can directly access multiple internal server networks and services.
Risk:
Compromise of a workstation could enable extensive lateral movement.
Recommendation:
Define required business traffic and implement least-privilege segmentation between user and server networks.
Finding ID:
NSA-002
Title:
Network Device Management Exposed to Untrusted Network
Severity:
High
Risk:
External or lower-trust systems may directly target privileged network-device administration.
Recommendation:
Restrict device management to approved management networks and secure administrative protocols.
Finding ID:
NSA-003
Title:
Remote VPN Users Have Excessive Internal Access
Severity:
High
Risk:
Compromise of a remote credential or endpoint may provide broad access to sensitive internal networks.
Recommendation:
Implement group-based VPN authorization and restrict remote access to approved applications and services.
Finding ID:
NSA-004
Title:
Critical Network Devices Do Not Send Logs to Central Monitoring
Severity:
High
Risk:
Security teams may be unable to detect or reconstruct malicious network activity.
Recommendation:
Centralize required network-device logging and validate retention and alerting.

80 β€” Example Finding β€” Temporary Firewall Rule

Section titled β€œ80 β€” Example Finding β€” Temporary Firewall Rule”
Finding ID:
NSA-005
Title:
Temporary Firewall Rule Remains Active Beyond Approved Period
Severity:
Medium
Risk:
Unnecessary connectivity increases attack surface and may provide an undocumented access path.
Recommendation:
Validate continued need, remove obsolete access, and enforce expiry for temporary firewall rules.

Use:

Exposure
+
Reachability
+
Privilege
+
Destination Sensitivity
+
Likelihood
+
Business Impact
=
Risk

Examples:

  • internet-facing critical management

  • unrestricted access to highly sensitive systems

  • confirmed high-impact security-control bypass

Examples:

  • broad user-to-server access

  • excessive VPN access

  • major monitoring gap

  • public administrative services

Examples:

  • stale firewall rules

  • weak recertification

  • unnecessary egress

  • isolated logging gaps

Examples:

  • naming

  • documentation

  • minor configuration cleanup

Use:

Immediate Attack Paths
↓
Privileged Exposure
↓
Critical Asset Exposure
↓
Segmentation Weaknesses
↓
Remote Access Risks
↓
Monitoring Gaps
↓
Governance / Cleanup

Examples:

  • remove public SSH

  • remove obsolete firewall rule

  • disable stale VPN account

  • restrict user-to-management access

  • enable missing syslog

Examples:

  • redesign segmentation

  • implement centralized AAA

  • redesign remote access

  • implement internal firewalling

  • improve network monitoring architecture

Use:

Immediate
0–7 Days
Short Term
7–30 Days
Medium Term
30–90 Days
Strategic
90+ Days
Finding Timeframe
Public Admin Access Immediate
Excessive VPN Access Immediate
Flat User/Server Network Short Term
Logging Gaps Medium Term
Enterprise Segmentation Redesign Strategic

Never close findings because:

someone says the firewall was updated.

Validate:

Required Traffic
β†’ Works
Unauthorized Traffic
β†’ Fails

Test:

Source Destination Expected Actual
User App HTTPS Allow
User Database Deny
User Management Deny
App Database Allow

Confirm:

Management Network
↓
Secure Admin
↓
Network Device

works.

Confirm user networks cannot perform the same administrative access.

Confirm:

  • authorized apps reachable

  • unnecessary subnets blocked

  • user group policy works

  • logs capture sessions

Generate a controlled event and confirm it appears in:

  • central logging

  • SIEM where applicable

Executives usually need:

  • overall posture

  • top risks

  • likely business impact

  • remediation priorities

Example:

The network security assessment identified material risk across internal segmentation, administrative access, remote connectivity, and centralized monitoring.
The highest-priority issues include broad user-to-server communication, excessive remote-access VPN permissions, and privileged management paths available from lower-trust networks.
Immediate remediation should reduce exposed administrative access and excessive remote connectivity.
Longer-term improvements should strengthen enterprise segmentation, firewall-governance processes, centralized AAA, and network-security monitoring.

Recommended structure:

1. Executive Summary
2. Assessment Scope
3. Methodology
4. Network Architecture
5. Asset Inventory
6. Trust Boundaries
7. Segmentation Review
8. ACL Review
9. Firewall Review
10. Public Exposure
11. Management Security
12. VPN Security
13. Routing & NAT
14. DNS / Network Services
15. Monitoring & Logging
16. Findings
17. Risk Summary
18. Remediation Roadmap
19. Positive Observations
20. Conclusion

Include controls that are working well.

Examples:

  • dedicated management network

  • strong VLAN segmentation

  • VPN MFA

  • centralized AAA

  • narrow firewall rules

  • good syslog coverage

  • regular rule recertification

Balanced assessments are more credible than reports containing only weaknesses.

Create:

Severity Count
Critical
High
Medium
Low

Then identify:

Top 5 Network Security Risks.

Be ready to explain:

Why is this rule risky?

Which attack path does it create?

Which system is exposed?

What happens if the source is compromised?

What is the safest remediation?

Could remediation affect production?

Avoid:

This configuration is bad.

Prefer:

This configuration allows a lower-trust source to reach a higher-value system over services that are not required by the documented business flow, increasing lateral-movement risk.

🎀 Network Security Assessment Interview Questions

Section titled β€œπŸŽ€ Network Security Assessment Interview Questions”

Practise without notes.

You discover users can directly access production database servers.

A strong response should discuss:

  • business requirement

  • traffic path

  • current security control

  • attack path

  • segmentation

  • required application flow

  • validation

A firewall contains a large Any/Any rule used by several applications.

Do not immediately delete it.

Use:

Identify Dependencies
↓
Collect Rule Usage
↓
Map Business Flows
↓
Create Specific Rules
↓
Test
↓
Remove Broad Rule
↓
Monitor

Remote VPN users can access every internal subnet.

Discuss:

  • VPN groups

  • authorization

  • segmentation

  • MFA

  • business roles

  • logging

Network administrators use Telnet from the general user network.

Discuss:

  • secure management protocol

  • dedicated management network

  • AAA

  • least privilege

  • logging

Firewall and VPN logs are retained for only one day.

Discuss:

  • detection

  • forensic investigation

  • business requirements

  • compliance

  • retention strategy

Use:

Scope
↓
Architecture
↓
Assets
↓
Trust Boundaries
↓
Traffic Paths
↓
Controls
↓
Monitoring
↓
Risk
↓
Remediation
↓
Validation

Avoid:

β€œI would scan the network and check the firewall.”

A stronger answer is:

β€œI would first confirm the assessment scope and critical assets, understand the network topology and trust boundaries, map required traffic flows, review public exposure, segmentation, ACL and firewall policies, management access, VPNs, routing and network services, then evaluate logging and monitoring before prioritizing findings according to actual business impact.”

That sounds like a Network Security Consultant.

Create sanitized examples of:

  • network architecture diagram

  • VLAN/subnet inventory

  • trust-boundary map

  • traffic matrix

  • public-exposure matrix

  • ACL review

  • firewall review

  • VPN access review

  • management access matrix

  • findings register

  • remediation roadmap

  • executive summary

Instead of:

Network security assessment experience.

Use:

Performed a structured enterprise network-security assessment in a lab environment covering network architecture, segmentation, ACLs, firewalls, VPNs, management access, routing, NAT, DNS, and centralized logging.

Or:

Identified excessive inter-segment connectivity, broad firewall policies, weak remote-access controls, and network-monitoring gaps and produced risk-rated remediation recommendations.

You should now be able to:

  • define network assessment scope

  • map network architecture

  • inventory important assets

  • identify trust boundaries

  • assess segmentation

  • review ACLs

  • review firewall policies

  • identify public exposure

  • assess management security

  • review VPN architecture

  • evaluate remote-access security

  • review routing and NAT

  • understand DNS/security monitoring implications

  • identify logging gaps

  • create defensible findings

  • rate risk

  • prioritize remediation

  • validate changes

  • explain findings to stakeholders

The objective is not:

I checked all network devices.

The objective is:

I understand which network paths exist, which trust relationships are unnecessary, where critical systems are exposed, which controls are weak, and what should be remediated first to reduce real attack paths.

You now have a repeatable methodology for:

Architecture Discovery
↓
Asset Inventory
↓
Trust Analysis
↓
Segmentation Review
↓
ACL Assessment
↓
Firewall Assessment
↓
VPN Assessment
↓
Management Security
↓
Network Monitoring
↓
Risk Analysis
↓
Remediation
↓
Reporting

This directly supports roles such as:

  • Network Security Engineer

  • Security Consultant

  • Firewall Engineer

  • Infrastructure Security Engineer

  • Security Architect

You now understand how to assess an enterprise network as a whole.

The next runbook goes deeper into one of the most important operational security controls in that network:

➑️ Next: Firewall Review Runbook

In the next runbook, you will systematically assess:

  • firewall architecture

  • zones and interfaces

  • policy rules

  • Any/Any access

  • public exposure

  • inbound publishing

  • outbound access

  • NAT

  • management-plane security

  • logging

  • unused rules

  • shadowed rules

  • temporary access

  • rule ownership

  • recertification

  • risk rating

  • remediation

  • firewall interview scenarios