Runbook 02 — Enterprise Container Registry Security Assessment
Runbook Information
Section titled “Runbook Information”| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Runbook ID | K8S-IMAGE-RUNBOOK-02 |
| Category | Container Registry Security Assessment |
| Runbook Type | Enterprise Security Assessment |
| Primary Team | Cloud Security Engineering |
| Supporting Teams | DevSecOps, Platform Engineering, Kubernetes Security, SOC, Compliance |
| Estimated Duration | 6–8 Hours |
| Assessment Frequency | Monthly / Before Production Releases |
| Supported Registries | Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, OCI-Compatible Registries |
| Compliance Alignment | CIS Kubernetes Benchmark, NIST SP 800-190, NIST SSDF, SLSA, ISO 27001, SOC 2 |
Executive Summary
Section titled “Executive Summary”A container registry is one of the most critical components of the Kubernetes software supply chain.
Every workload deployed into Kubernetes ultimately depends upon images stored within trusted container registries.
A compromised registry can allow attackers to:
- Replace production images
- Introduce malware
- Modify software dependencies
- Remove rollback versions
- Bypass security controls
- Distribute malicious containers across the enterprise
This runbook provides a complete enterprise methodology for assessing registry security, governance, integrity, and operational readiness.
Enterprise Scenario
Section titled “Enterprise Scenario”CloudNova Technologies operates multiple Kubernetes clusters supporting:
- Customer-facing applications
- Internal microservices
- AI workloads
- Financial systems
- Healthcare platforms
Container images are stored across multiple registries:
- Amazon ECR
- Azure Container Registry
- Harbor
- Development registries
A recent security assessment identified several concerns:
- Shared administrator accounts
- Mutable production tags
- Missing vulnerability scanning
- Missing lifecycle policies
- Excessive IAM permissions
- Long-lived credentials
- Public repositories
- Missing registry audit logs
- No replication strategy
- Weak incident response procedures
The CISO has requested a complete enterprise assessment before approving additional production deployments.
Assessment Objectives
Section titled “Assessment Objectives”Validate:
- Registry architecture
- Repository governance
- Identity and Access Management
- Authentication methods
- Least privilege access
- Image integrity
- Registry encryption
- Vulnerability scanning
- Image signing support
- Repository lifecycle management
- Audit logging
- Monitoring
- Backup strategy
- Replication
- Disaster recovery
- Kubernetes integration
- Compliance readiness
Enterprise Registry Architecture
Section titled “Enterprise Registry Architecture” Developer
│
▼
CI/CD Pipeline
│
▼
Security Scanning
│
▼
Image Signing
│
▼
Enterprise Registry
┌─────────┼─────────┐
Development Staging Production
│ │ │
└──────────┼──────────┘
│
▼
Kubernetes Clusters
│
▼
Runtime MonitoringAssessment Scope
Section titled “Assessment Scope”Review:
- Registry Platform
- Repository Structure
- IAM Policies
- Authentication
- Repository Permissions
- Registry Encryption
- Vulnerability Scanning
- Image Signing
- Image Attestations
- Tag Immutability
- Lifecycle Policies
- Audit Logging
- Registry Monitoring
- Replication
- Disaster Recovery
- Kubernetes Pull Access
- CI/CD Integration
Required Tools
Section titled “Required Tools”| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Docker | Registry Validation |
| kubectl | Kubernetes Review |
| Trivy | Image Validation |
| Cosign | Signature Verification |
| Cloud CLI | Registry Administration |
| jq | JSON Parsing |
| Helm | Platform Validation |
Registry Assessment Workflow
Section titled “Registry Assessment Workflow”Registry Discovery
│
▼
Repository Review
│
▼
IAM Assessment
│
▼
Scanning Review
│
▼
Integrity Validation
│
▼
Monitoring Review
│
▼
Backup Assessment
│
▼
Risk Assessment
│
▼
Final ReportPhase 1 — Registry Discovery
Section titled “Phase 1 — Registry Discovery”Collect:
- Registry Name
- Registry Type
- Cloud Provider
- Version
- Region
- Owner
- Environment
Identify:
- Production Registries
- Development Registries
- Public Registries
- Temporary Registries
Phase 2 — Repository Governance
Section titled “Phase 2 — Repository Governance”Review:
- Repository Naming Standards
- Repository Ownership
- Repository Classification
- Business Owners
- Technical Owners
Validate:
- Development
- Testing
- Staging
- Production
Confirm.
Repository documentation exists.
Phase 3 — Identity & Access Management Review
Section titled “Phase 3 — Identity & Access Management Review”Review:
- Registry Administrators
- CI/CD Roles
- Kubernetes Pull Roles
- Developers
- Security Team
Validate.
Least Privilege.
Review:
- Shared Accounts
- Service Accounts
- Temporary Credentials
Reject.
Permanent Administrator Tokens.
Phase 4 — Authentication Assessment
Section titled “Phase 4 — Authentication Assessment”Validate.
Authentication methods.
Preferred:
- IAM Roles
- Workload Identity
- Managed Identity
- Short-lived Tokens
Review.
Credential Rotation.
Reject.
Static Passwords.
Phase 5 — Repository Permission Review
Section titled “Phase 5 — Repository Permission Review”Review.
Permissions.
- Pull
- Push
- Delete
- Policy Management
- Admin
Confirm.
Production repositories:
Push access restricted.
Phase 6 — Registry Encryption Assessment
Section titled “Phase 6 — Registry Encryption Assessment”Validate.
Encryption.
- At Rest
- In Transit
Review.
- TLS
- KMS
- Customer Managed Keys
Confirm.
Key Rotation.
Phase 7 — Image Integrity Assessment
Section titled “Phase 7 — Image Integrity Assessment”Review.
- Image Digests
- Immutable Tags
- Image Signing
- Trusted Keys
- Trusted Identities
Reject.
Unsigned Production Images.
Phase 8 — Vulnerability Scanning Assessment
Section titled “Phase 8 — Vulnerability Scanning Assessment”Validate.
Registry Scanning.
Review.
- Scan on Push
- Continuous Scan
- Critical Findings
- High Findings
Confirm.
Deployment Approval Process.
Phase 9 — Repository Lifecycle Review
Section titled “Phase 9 — Repository Lifecycle Review”Review.
Lifecycle Policies.
Validate.
- Retention
- Cleanup
- Rollback Images
- Archive
Reject.
Unlimited Image Retention.
Phase 10 — Registry Monitoring Review
Section titled “Phase 10 — Registry Monitoring Review”Review.
Monitoring.
- Push Events
- Pull Events
- Delete Events
- Login Events
- Policy Changes
Confirm.
Security Alerts.
Phase 11 — Audit Logging Review
Section titled “Phase 11 — Audit Logging Review”Review.
Logs.
- Authentication
- Image Push
- Image Pull
- Image Delete
- Policy Changes
- Repository Changes
- IAM Changes
Confirm.
Central SIEM Integration.
Phase 12 — Registry Replication Review
Section titled “Phase 12 — Registry Replication Review”Review.
Cross-region Replication.
Cross-account Replication.
Geo Redundancy.
Validate.
Recovery Objectives.
Phase 13 — Backup & Disaster Recovery Assessment
Section titled “Phase 13 — Backup & Disaster Recovery Assessment”Review.
- Registry Backup
- Metadata Backup
- Repository Restore
- Recovery Time
- Recovery Point
Confirm.
Periodic Recovery Testing.
Phase 14 — Kubernetes Integration Review
Section titled “Phase 14 — Kubernetes Integration Review”Review.
- Image Pull Secrets
- Workload Identity
- Registry Access
- Admission Controls
- Signature Verification
Confirm.
Only Approved Registries used.
Phase 15 — CI/CD Integration Review
Section titled “Phase 15 — CI/CD Integration Review”Validate.
Pipeline:
- Build
- Scan
- Sign
- Push
- Verify
Confirm.
Failed Images blocked.
Phase 16 — Software Supply Chain Assessment
Section titled “Phase 16 — Software Supply Chain Assessment”Review.
- Build Provenance
- SBOM
- Image Signature
- Trusted Registry
- Admission Policies
Compare.
SLSA Requirements.
Phase 17 — Operational Readiness Assessment
Section titled “Phase 17 — Operational Readiness Assessment”Review.
- Incident Response
- Monitoring
- Escalation
- Documentation
- Maintenance
Validate.
Operational Procedures.
Enterprise Registry Security Checklist
Section titled “Enterprise Registry Security Checklist”| Control | Status |
|---|---|
| Private Registry | ☐ |
| Repository Standards | ☐ |
| Business Ownership | ☐ |
| IAM Least Privilege | ☐ |
| Short-lived Authentication | ☐ |
| Encryption at Rest | ☐ |
| TLS Enabled | ☐ |
| Scan on Push | ☐ |
| Continuous Scanning | ☐ |
| Image Signing | ☐ |
| Immutable Tags | ☐ |
| Trusted Identities | ☐ |
| Lifecycle Policies | ☐ |
| Rollback Images | ☐ |
| Registry Monitoring | ☐ |
| Audit Logging | ☐ |
| SIEM Integration | ☐ |
| Replication | ☐ |
| Backup | ☐ |
| Disaster Recovery | ☐ |
| Kubernetes Integration | ☐ |
| Admission Controls | ☐ |
| Evidence Collected | ☐ |
Risk Classification
Section titled “Risk Classification”Critical
Section titled “Critical”- Public Production Registry
- Shared Administrator Accounts
- Unsigned Images
- Mutable Production Tags
- Registry Compromise
- Missing Audit Logs
- Missing Vulnerability Scanning
- Excessive IAM Permissions
- No Encryption
- Missing Lifecycle Policies
- Missing Backup
Medium
Section titled “Medium”- Weak Documentation
- Manual Reviews
- Missing Repository Labels
- Naming
- Metadata
- Cosmetic Improvements
Remediation Priorities
Section titled “Remediation Priorities”Immediate
Section titled “Immediate”- Remove public access
- Enable scan-on-push
- Restrict administrator access
- Enable immutable tags
- Require image signing
- Enable audit logging
Short-Term
Section titled “Short-Term”- Configure lifecycle policies
- Integrate SIEM
- Enable registry replication
- Rotate credentials
- Implement least privilege IAM
Long-Term
Section titled “Long-Term”- Automated registry governance
- Continuous compliance monitoring
- Cross-region disaster recovery
- Automated image quarantine
- Supply chain maturity improvements
Registry Security Assessment Matrix
Section titled “Registry Security Assessment Matrix”| Domain | Rating |
|---|---|
| Registry Architecture | |
| Repository Governance | |
| IAM | |
| Authentication | |
| Encryption | |
| Vulnerability Scanning | |
| Image Integrity | |
| Lifecycle Management | |
| Monitoring | |
| Audit Logging | |
| Backup | |
| Disaster Recovery | |
| Kubernetes Integration | |
| Compliance |
Ratings:
- Effective
- Partially Effective
- Ineffective
Evidence Collection
Section titled “Evidence Collection”Collect:
- Registry Configuration
- Repository List
- IAM Policies
- Authentication Methods
- Scan Results
- Lifecycle Policies
- Registry Logs
- SIEM Events
- Backup Configuration
- Replication Settings
- Kubernetes Pull Configuration
- Admission Policies
- Assessment Results
Enterprise Registry Security Report
Section titled “Enterprise Registry Security Report”Assessment Name:
Enterprise Container Registry Security Assessment
Assessment Date:
Assessor:
Registry Platform:
Registry Region:
Environment:
Repositories Reviewed:
Critical Findings:
High Findings:
Medium Findings:
Low Findings:
Registry Encryption:
Image Signing:
Scan on Push:
Continuous Scanning:
Lifecycle Policies:
Immutable Tags:
Registry IAM:
Monitoring:
Audit Logging:
Backup:
Replication:
Disaster Recovery:
Overall Risk:
Recommendations:
Production Approval:
Approved
Conditionally Approved
RejectedSuccess Criteria
Section titled “Success Criteria”The assessment is successful when:
- All production registries are identified.
- Repository governance is documented.
- IAM follows least privilege.
- Registry authentication is secure.
- Images are scanned.
- Images are signed.
- Immutable tags are enforced.
- Lifecycle policies exist.
- Monitoring and logging are enabled.
- Backups and replication are configured.
- Kubernetes only pulls from approved registries.
- Evidence supports compliance and audit requirements.
Operational Best Practices
Section titled “Operational Best Practices”- Monitor image pushes
- Review failed authentication attempts
- Investigate critical vulnerability findings
- Monitor registry availability
Weekly
Section titled “Weekly”- Review repository permissions
- Validate lifecycle policy execution
- Verify image-signing integrity
- Review audit logs
Monthly
Section titled “Monthly”- Perform full registry security assessment
- Review IAM assignments
- Validate replication
- Test image restore procedures
- Audit registry compliance
Quarterly
Section titled “Quarterly”- Test disaster recovery
- Rotate credentials and signing keys
- Review supply chain maturity
- Conduct registry penetration testing
- Review incident response procedures
Runbook Summary
Section titled “Runbook Summary”This runbook provides a complete enterprise methodology for assessing the security of container registries supporting Kubernetes workloads.
It evaluates every critical control across the container image lifecycle, including repository governance, identity and access management, registry encryption, vulnerability scanning, image signing, lifecycle management, monitoring, audit logging, replication, backup, disaster recovery, and Kubernetes integration.
By following this assessment process, organisations can ensure that only trusted, verified, and properly governed container images are stored, managed, and distributed to Kubernetes environments, significantly reducing the risk of software supply chain attacks and strengthening overall cloud-native security.
What’s Next?
Section titled “What’s Next?”Next Runbook: Runbook 03 — Kubernetes Software Supply Chain Security Assessment
In the next runbook, you will perform an end-to-end enterprise assessment of the Kubernetes software supply chain, covering source-code governance, CI/CD security, dependency management, build provenance, SBOMs, image signing, artifact integrity, admission control, deployment validation, runtime protection, and alignment with SLSA and NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF).