Skip to content

02 Due Diligence

Vendor Risk Management provides the overall lifecycle.

Due Diligence is where the organization investigates whether the vendor can actually meet its security, privacy, compliance, operational, and contractual expectations.

The core question is:

What evidence supports the vendor’s claims, and what risk remains if we use this vendor?

A practical due diligence workflow looks like:

Vendor Request
Inherent Risk
Due Diligence Scope
Questionnaire
Evidence Collection
Security Review
Privacy Review
Compliance Review
Resilience Review
Finding Identification
Residual Risk
Recommendation
Approval

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

  • Explain vendor due diligence.

  • Understand when due diligence should occur.

  • Determine the appropriate assessment depth.

  • Build a vendor due diligence questionnaire.

  • Request and evaluate supporting evidence.

  • Review security governance.

  • Review IAM and privileged access.

  • Assess vulnerability and patch management.

  • Review secure development practices.

  • Assess encryption and key management.

  • Evaluate logging and monitoring.

  • Review incident-response capabilities.

  • Assess privacy controls.

  • Evaluate subprocessors.

  • Review compliance certifications.

  • Review SOC reports.

  • Assess ISO certifications.

  • Evaluate business continuity and disaster recovery.

  • Understand financial and operational due diligence.

  • Identify vendor findings.

  • Determine residual vendor risk.

  • Build a vendor recommendation.

  • Maintain an auditable due diligence evidence pack.

Vendor due diligence is the structured investigation of a third party before or during a business relationship.

It evaluates whether the vendor has appropriate:

Governance
Cybersecurity
Privacy
Compliance
Operational Controls
Resilience
Financial Stability

to support the service safely.

2. Due Diligence Is More Than a Questionnaire

Section titled “2. Due Diligence Is More Than a Questionnaire”

Weak:

Vendor Questionnaire
Vendor Answers "Yes"
Approved

Strong:

Vendor Questionnaire
Supporting Evidence
Validation
Findings
Risk Assessment
Decision

The critical word is:

Evidence

Due diligence should normally occur:

Before Contract
Before Production Access
Before Sensitive Data Processing

and later when required through:

Periodic Reassessment
Contract Renewal
Major Scope Change
Security Incident
New Subprocessor
Material Service Change

4. Due Diligence Starts With Inherent Risk

Section titled “4. Due Diligence Starts With Inherent Risk”

Do not send every vendor the same 300-question assessment.

First determine:

What Service?
What Data?
What Access?
How Critical?
Which Regulations?

Then define assessment depth.

Example:

Vendor Risk Due Diligence
Office supplier Low Basic screening
Training provider Low Limited review
Marketing SaaS Medium Standard assessment
HR SaaS High Detailed assessment
Cloud hosting Critical Full due diligence
Identity provider Critical Full due diligence

Create:

DD-YYYY-####

Example:

DD-2026-0035

Record:

Vendor
Service
Business Owner
Risk Tier
Assessment Owner
Start Date
Target Completion

Create:

01 Due Diligence Scope

Determine whether the assessment will cover:

Security
Privacy
Compliance
Resilience
Financial
Legal
AI
Operational Risk

Vendor:

CloudHR

Processes:

Employee Data
Salary Information
Bank Information
Government Identifiers

Assessment should include:

Security
+
Privacy
+
Resilience
+
Compliance
+
Subprocessors

Create:

02 Vendor Due Diligence Questionnaire

Suggested domains:

01 Organization & Governance
02 Security Governance
03 Asset Management
04 IAM
05 Encryption
06 Network Security
07 Vulnerability Management
08 Secure Development
09 Logging & Monitoring
10 Incident Response
11 Business Continuity
12 Privacy
13 Compliance
14 Subprocessors
15 Cloud Security
16 AI Governance
17 Personnel Security

Ask:

Who Owns Security?
Is There a Formal
Security Program?
Are Policies Approved?
How Often Are
Policies Reviewed?
Is Risk Assessment
Performed?

Do not request documents randomly.

Build:

03 Vendor Evidence Request List

Example:

Domain Evidence
Governance Security policy
IAM Access-control policy
Vulnerability Scan / remediation summary
Security Testing Pen-test summary
Compliance SOC 2 / ISO certificate
Privacy Privacy policy / DPA
BCP Business-continuity plan
DR Recovery-test evidence
Incident Response IR plan
Training Awareness evidence

Evidence may be:

Public
Confidential
Restricted

Handle vendor assurance documents appropriately.

Always check:

Evidence Date
Assessment Period
Expiration Date
Current Service Scope

A five-year-old penetration test is weak evidence for today’s environment.

Review whether vendor security governance includes:

Security Leadership
Policies
Risk Management
Control Ownership
Metrics
Security Training
Internal Reviews

Verify:

Policy Approved?
Version Current?
Scope Appropriate?
Review Frequency?
Owner Defined?

Ask whether the vendor itself manages third parties.

Your Vendor
Their Vendors

This becomes:

Fourth-Party Risk

Assess whether the vendor maintains:

Hardware Inventory
Software Inventory
Cloud Assets
Critical Systems
Data Assets

For privacy-sensitive vendors ask:

What Customer Data
Do You Process?
Where?
How Is It Classified?
Who Can Access It?

Review:

User Provisioning
MFA
SSO
RBAC
Privileged Access
Service Accounts
Access Reviews
Offboarding

Ask:

Is MFA Required
for Administrators?
Employees?
Remote Access?
Production Access?

For administrators verify controls such as:

Named Accounts
MFA
PAM
Logging
Approval
Periodic Review

Assess:

Join
Access Approved
Role Change
Access Updated
Termination
Access Removed

If vendor staff can access your environment, determine:

Who?
Why?
How Often?
Which Privileges?
How Is Access Logged?

Assess:

Encryption at Rest
Encryption in Transit
Backup Encryption
Database Encryption
Key Management

Evidence may include:

Architecture
Configuration Statement
Audit Report
Encryption Standard
Independent Assessment

Review:

Key Storage
Key Rotation
Key Access
Separation of Duties
HSM / KMS
Key Revocation

Assess:

Network Segmentation
Firewall Management
Remote Access
IDS / IPS
Zero Trust Controls
Production Isolation

Ask:

How Are
Internet-Facing Systems
Inventoried?
Scanned?
Monitored?
Patched?

Assess:

Scanning Frequency
Severity Methodology
Remediation SLA
Patch Management
Exceptions
Validation

A vendor may define:

Critical
→ 15 Days
High
→ 30 Days
Medium
→ 90 Days

The important question is whether those timelines meet your risk expectations.

If vendor says:

Critical Findings
Can Remain Open
for 180 Days

that may create a material risk depending on the service.

Ask:

Is Penetration Testing
Performed Annually?
Is It Independent?
What Is in Scope?
Are Critical Findings
Remediated?

Prefer:

Executive Summary
Scope
Date
Tester
Finding Severity
Remediation Status

rather than full sensitive technical reports unless required.

For software vendors assess:

Secure Coding
Code Review
SAST
DAST
Dependency Scanning
Secrets Scanning
Threat Modeling
Security Testing

Assess:

Open-Source Dependencies
SBOM
Package Integrity
Third-Party Components
Build Security
Code Signing

Check whether developers store:

Passwords
API Keys
Tokens
Private Keys

in:

Source Code

or managed secret systems.

Assess whether the vendor logs:

Authentication
Administrative Activity
Security Events
Data Access
Configuration Changes
API Activity

Ask:

How Long
Are Logs Retained?
Are Logs Protected?
Who Can Access Them?

Determine whether vendor has:

SOC
SIEM
MDR
24×7 Monitoring

where appropriate.

Review:

IR Plan
Roles
Escalation
Customer Notification
Forensics
Lessons Learned

Ask:

How Quickly
Will You Notify Us
if Our Data
or Service
Is Affected?

Evidence may include:

Tabletop Exercises
Simulation
Lessons Learned
Testing Schedule

Create:

04 Business Continuity Assessment

Review:

Business Continuity Plan
Disaster Recovery
Backups
RTO
RPO
Alternate Sites
Failover
Testing

Ask:

What happens to our business if this vendor is unavailable for 24 hours?

Vendor RTO:

24 Hours

Business requirement:

4 Hours

Result:

Resilience Gap

Vendor RPO:

24 Hours

Business tolerance:

1 Hour

Potential:

Data Loss Risk

Check:

Backup Frequency
Encryption
Separation
Immutability
Restore Testing
Retention

Create:

05 Privacy Due Diligence Checklist

Assess:

Personal Data
Sensitive Data
Purpose
Location
Retention
Deletion
Subprocessors
Rights Support
Incident Notification
International Transfers

Ask:

Why Does the Vendor
Need the Data?

Ensure:

Data
Specific Purpose

Challenge:

Does the Vendor
Need Every Field
We Plan to Send?

Record:

Primary Region
Backup Region
Support Location
Subprocessor Location

Ask:

How Long Is
Customer Data Retained?
What Happens
After Contract
Termination?

Verify whether the vendor can delete:

Primary Data
Replicas
Archives
Backups
Logs

according to applicable requirements and technical capabilities.

Determine whether vendor can assist with:

Access
Correction
Deletion
Export
Restriction

Request current:

Subprocessor List

Review:

Service
Country
Data
Purpose

Assess whether vendor processing introduces:

New Countries
New Regions
New Subprocessors

requiring legal/privacy analysis.

Create:

06 Compliance Evidence Matrix

Review relevant:

SOC 1
SOC 2
ISO 27001
ISO 27017
ISO 27018
PCI DSS
HIPAA
Other Sector Requirements

For SOC 2 assess:

Type I or Type II?
Audit Period?
Scope?
Relevant Services?
Exceptions?
Subservice Organizations?
CUECs?

Type I generally evaluates control design at a point in time.

Type II generally evaluates controls over a period.

For ongoing assurance, Type II usually provides more operating-effectiveness information.

Do not ignore:

Exceptions
Deviations
Qualified Results

Review whether they affect your use of the vendor.

Extract:

Complementary
User Entity Controls

Create:

07 CUEC Register

Use:

CUEC Internal Owner Implemented? Evidence

Verify:

Vendor Legal Name
Scope
Services
Locations
Certificate Date
Expiration
Certification Body

For higher-risk ISO-certified vendors, additional evidence such as applicable scope or control information may provide better assurance.

If payment card information is involved, determine:

Vendor PCI Role
Service Provider?
Scope?
Attestation?
Responsibility?

If PHI is involved, assess:

Business Associate Role
BAA
Security Controls
Subcontractors
Incident Requirements

Cloud providers require additional consideration around:

Shared Responsibility
Regions
IAM
Encryption
Logging
Service Availability
Customer Configuration

Do not expect a cloud vendor to control:

Your IAM
Your Security Groups
Your Data Classification
Your Application

when those are customer responsibilities.

For SaaS assess:

Tenant Isolation
Admin Access
Authentication
Data Export
Deletion
Logging
API Security
Configuration

Ask:

What prevents Customer A from seeing Customer B’s data?

Evidence can include:

Architecture
Security Testing
SOC Evidence
Pen-Test Scope

AI vendor assessments should include:

Prompt Retention
Training Usage
Model Improvement
Fine-Tuning
Data Location
Subprocessors
Vector Storage
Output Controls
Model Security

Always ask:

Is customer data used to train, fine-tune, or improve models?

Assess:

Prompt Retention
Conversation History
Uploaded Files
Model Logs
Embeddings

Evaluate whether enterprise customer data is isolated across:

Accounts
Projects
Models
Vector Stores
Logs

Ask whether deletion removes:

Prompt Data
Uploaded Files
Embeddings
Vector Entries
Conversation History

Assess:

Background Screening
Confidentiality Agreements
Security Training
Privileged Personnel Controls
Termination

Where vendor employees work remotely, consider:

Endpoint Security
VPN
Device Management
Physical Privacy
Data Download Restrictions

For critical vendors, evaluate:

Financial Stability
Revenue Trends
Debt
Funding
Bankruptcy Risk
Insurance

with the appropriate Finance or Procurement team.

Where relevant assess:

Coverage
Limits
Expiry
Incident Types

but do not treat insurance as a substitute for security controls.

Assess:

Staffing
Support Model
Service Capacity
Customer Support
Change Management
Release Management
Service Dependencies

Consider whether the service depends heavily on:

Single Country
Single Region
Single Data Center

Ask:

Do We Already Depend
on This Vendor
Elsewhere?

Example:

Cloud Provider
Hosting
Identity
Backup
Analytics

A single outage could affect multiple services.

Create:

08 Due Diligence Findings Register

Use:

ID Finding Risk Severity Owner Status

Condition:

Vendor Administrators
Do Not Use MFA

Risk:

Privileged Account
Compromise

Severity:

Critical

Condition:

Vendor Retains
Customer Data
Indefinitely

Risk:

Over-Retention
+
Data Exposure

Business requires:

RTO:
4 Hours

Vendor provides:

RTO:
24 Hours

Risk:

Operational
Resilience Gap

Vendor SOC 2 includes repeated exception relating to:

User Access Reviews

Assess whether this could affect your service.

For each control determine:

Strong
Adequate
Partial
Weak
Not Implemented

based on evidence.

Start with:

Inherent Risk

then consider:

Vendor Controls
Contract Controls
Customer Controls
Compensating Controls

to determine:

Residual Risk

Inherent risk:

Critical

Vendor controls:

Strong

Customer controls:

Strong

Residual:

Medium

depending on the defined methodology.

Use:

Accept
Mitigate
Transfer
Avoid

Example:

Vendor Does Not
Support MFA

Possible outcome:

Require MFA
Before Production

If vendor cannot immediately remediate:

Restrict Network Access
IP Allowlisting
Time-Limited Accounts
Enhanced Monitoring

may reduce risk while a permanent fix is pursued.

Risk acceptance should include:

Risk
Business Impact
Compensating Controls
Owner
Approval
Expiry

Create:

09 Vendor Risk Recommendation

Possible decisions:

APPROVE
APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS
REMEDIATION REQUIRED
ESCALATE
REJECT
APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS

Conditions:

1 MFA enabled for privileged access
2 Prompt retention reduced
3 BCP testing evidence provided
4 Contract updated for incident notification
5 Critical findings remediated before production

Separate:

Must Complete
Before Contract

from:

Must Complete
Before Production

and:

Post-Onboarding
Improvement

Create:

10 Due Diligence Evidence Pack

Suggested structure:

01 Intake
02 Inherent Risk
03 Questionnaire
04 Security Evidence
05 Privacy Evidence
06 Compliance Evidence
07 Resilience Evidence
08 Financial Review
09 Findings
10 Remediation
11 Risk Decision
12 Approval

Every finding should be traceable to:

Question
Evidence
Analysis
Risk
Decision

Create:

Evidence Version Date Reviewer Result

Security reports may contain:

Architecture
Security Findings
Customer Controls
Infrastructure Information

Store them with appropriate access restrictions.

Do not complete the assessment until:

  • inherent risk confirmed.

  • assessment scope defined.

  • questionnaire completed.

  • required evidence obtained.

  • evidence reviewed.

  • security review completed.

  • privacy review completed where applicable.

  • compliance evidence reviewed.

  • resilience reviewed.

  • findings documented.

  • residual risk determined.

  • remediation requirements assigned.

  • recommendation documented.

  • approval recorded.

If evidence is unavailable:

No Evidence

should not automatically become:

Control Exists

Possible outcome:

Unable to Validate

which may increase residual risk.

Example:

Vendor:
"We Do Not Share
Security Documentation."

Alternative assurance may include:

Independent Reports
Certifications
Security Portal
Controlled Review Session
Contractual Representations

But the inability to obtain sufficient assurance should be documented.

Some vendors may provide reports only after:

NDA

Coordinate with:

Legal
Procurement

rather than skipping evidence review.

Due diligence is iterative.

Workflow:

Initial Questionnaire
Evidence Review
Questions
Vendor Clarification
Additional Evidence
Final Assessment

Create:

11 Due Diligence Request Tracker

Use:

Request Sent Due Received Status

Set internal target dates for:

Questionnaire
Evidence
Clarifications
Remediation

Monitor cases:

0–15 Days
16–30 Days
31–60 Days
60+ Days

Escalate when:

Vendor Unresponsive
Critical Evidence Missing
Critical Finding Identified
Launch Date Approaching
High Residual Risk
Contract Signed Prematurely

Track:

Assessments Completed
Average Completion Time
Critical Findings
Evidence Completeness
Risk Acceptances
Vendor Response Time
Due Diligence
Completed on Time
──────────────── × 100
Due Diligence Due
Required Evidence
Received
─────────────── × 100
Evidence Requested
Vendor Findings
Closed On Time
────────────── × 100
Findings Due
Vendors Approved
with Open
Critical Findings
High-Risk Vendors
Without Sufficient
Control Evidence
Expired Vendor
Risk Acceptances

Create:

12 Vendor Due Diligence Dashboard

Example:

Metric Target
High-risk due diligence complete 100%
Required evidence received 100%
Critical gaps before production 0
Overdue assessments 0
Expired risk acceptances 0
Critical findings overdue 0

118. Practical Activity — Cloud SaaS Vendor

Section titled “118. Practical Activity — Cloud SaaS Vendor”

Assess fictional:

CloudCRM

CloudCRM:

Stores Customer PI
Uses AWS
Uses Subprocessors
Offers SSO
Provides SOC 2

Determine:

Risk Tier
Evidence Required
Security Questions
Privacy Questions
Residual Risk
Approval Decision

CloudCRM uses:

Username + Password

for privileged administrators.

No MFA.

Determine:

Finding
Risk
Severity
Required Remediation
Approval Impact

SOC 2 report contains:

3 Exceptions

including failure to remove terminated employee access promptly.

Assess:

Relevance
Risk
Customer Impact
Follow-Up Questions
Compensating Controls

Vendor processes:

Customer Support Prompts

and retains prompts for:

180 Days

with provider model improvement enabled.

Determine:

Privacy Risk
Security Risk
Required Contract Change
Technical Setting
Approval Recommendation

Critical vendor:

RTO:
24 Hours

CloudPay requirement:

RTO:
4 Hours

Determine:

Residual Risk
Alternative Controls
Business Approval
Exit Considerations

123. Practical Activity — Subprocessor Risk

Section titled “123. Practical Activity — Subprocessor Risk”

Vendor uses an unlisted support provider in another country with access to customer data.

Determine:

Privacy Impact
Contract Impact
Transfer Impact
Vendor Finding
Required Action

Vendor Due Diligence Operational Checklist

Section titled “Vendor Due Diligence Operational Checklist”
  • vendor request received.

  • business owner identified.

  • service understood.

  • inherent risk completed.

  • risk tier assigned.

  • security scope defined.

  • privacy scope defined.

  • compliance scope defined.

  • resilience scope defined.

  • AI scope defined where applicable.

  • questionnaire sent.

  • response received.

  • unanswered items followed up.

  • contradictory responses investigated.

  • security policies reviewed.

  • audit reports reviewed.

  • certifications validated.

  • penetration testing reviewed.

  • BCP evidence reviewed.

  • privacy evidence reviewed.

  • evidence freshness verified.

  • MFA assessed.

  • privileged access assessed.

  • access reviews assessed.

  • termination assessed.

  • service accounts assessed.

  • encryption reviewed.

  • vulnerability management reviewed.

  • patching reviewed.

  • secure development reviewed.

  • logging reviewed.

  • incident response reviewed.

  • personal data identified.

  • purpose reviewed.

  • minimization reviewed.

  • location reviewed.

  • retention reviewed.

  • deletion reviewed.

  • rights support assessed.

  • subprocessors reviewed.

  • SOC report reviewed where relevant.

  • CUECs captured.

  • ISO certificate validated.

  • PCI evidence reviewed where applicable.

  • HIPAA evidence reviewed where applicable.

  • BCP reviewed.

  • DR reviewed.

  • RTO assessed.

  • RPO assessed.

  • recovery testing reviewed.

  • backup controls assessed.

  • findings documented.

  • severity assigned.

  • vendor response obtained.

  • remediation assigned.

  • compensating controls identified.

  • inherent risk documented.

  • control effectiveness assessed.

  • residual risk determined.

  • risk acceptance documented where required.

  • recommendation documented.

  • pre-contract conditions identified.

  • pre-production conditions identified.

  • approval recorded.

  • questionnaire retained.

  • supporting evidence retained.

  • analysis retained.

  • findings retained.

  • remediation retained.

  • decision retained.

Vendor responses should be validated with evidence.

Mistake 2 — Same Assessment for Every Vendor

Section titled “Mistake 2 — Same Assessment for Every Vendor”

Assessment depth should follow risk.

Mistake 3 — Collect Evidence Without Reviewing It

Section titled “Mistake 3 — Collect Evidence Without Reviewing It”

Downloading a SOC report is not due diligence.

You must read and assess it.

Vendor may have a certification covering:

Corporate Office

while your service runs from:

Different Platform

Some controls remain the customer’s responsibility.

Stale evidence may no longer represent current operations.

Cybersecurity controls alone do not address data-purpose, retention, deletion, and transfer risks.

A secure vendor can still create major risk if its service cannot recover.

Fourth parties can create hidden security and privacy risks.

AI providers may use submitted data differently from traditional SaaS vendors.

Due diligence should end with a risk recommendation, not a pile of documents.

Mistake 12 — Approve Before Critical Findings Are Resolved

Section titled “Mistake 12 — Approve Before Critical Findings Are Resolved”

Business urgency should not silently override risk governance.

Questionnaire
Vendor Says Yes
Certificate
Approve
Inherent Risk
Risk-Based Scope
Questionnaire
Evidence
Validation
Security Review
Privacy Review
Compliance Review
Resilience Review
Findings
Residual Risk
Remediation
Recommendation
Approval

A GRC professional performing vendor due diligence may:

  • review vendor intake.

  • confirm inherent risk.

  • define assessment scope.

  • issue security questionnaires.

  • request supporting evidence.

  • review policies and assurance reports.

  • analyze SOC reports.

  • validate ISO certificates.

  • review CUECs.

  • review penetration-test summaries.

  • evaluate IAM controls.

  • review vulnerability management.

  • assess privacy controls.

  • assess subprocessors.

  • evaluate BCP and DR.

  • document findings.

  • assess residual risk.

  • coordinate remediation.

  • prepare vendor recommendations.

  • maintain evidence.

  • escalate critical risks.

  • support procurement and contractual decisions.

GRC works closely with:

Security
Privacy
Legal
Procurement
Business Owners
Cloud
Architecture
Resilience
Finance
AI Governance
Vendor Questionnaire
Manual Review
Risk Tiers
Standard Questionnaires
Evidence Lists
Approval Process
SOC Review
ISO Validation
Privacy Review
Findings
Residual Risk
Automated Intake
Evidence Portals
Procurement Integration
Workflow
Risk Analytics
Continuous Evidence
Dynamic Risk
External Security Signals
Automated Control Validation
Continuous Vendor Assurance

For every vendor ask:

What Is the Service?
What Risk Does
the Service Create?
What Evidence
Do We Need?
Does the Evidence
Match the Service?
Is It Current?
Do Their Security
Controls Work?
Do They Protect
Our Data?
Can They Delete
Our Data?
Who Are Their
Subprocessors?
What Happens
During an Incident?
Can They Recover
from an Outage?
What Certifications
Do They Have?
What Do Those
Certifications Actually Cover?
What Findings
Remain Open?
What Is the
Residual Risk?
What Must Be
Fixed Before Contract?
What Must Be
Fixed Before Production?
Who Accepts
Remaining Risk?
Can We Defend
Our Decision Later?

That is the practical due diligence mindset.

  • Due diligence is the evidence-based assessment phase of Vendor Risk Management.

  • Assessment depth should follow inherent vendor risk.

  • Questionnaires alone do not provide sufficient assurance.

  • Evidence must be reviewed for relevance, freshness, scope, and reliability.

  • IAM, MFA, privileged access, encryption, vulnerability management, logging, incident response, and secure development are important security domains.

  • Privacy due diligence should cover purpose, data, location, retention, deletion, subprocessors, and privacy-rights support.

  • SOC reports should be reviewed for scope, exceptions, subservice organizations, and CUECs.

  • ISO certificates should be checked for legal entity, scope, services, locations, and validity.

  • Critical vendors should undergo business continuity and disaster recovery review.

  • RTO and RPO should be compared against business requirements.

  • AI vendors introduce additional questions about prompts, retention, training, model improvement, and vector data.

  • Missing evidence should increase uncertainty rather than automatically being treated as a control pass.

  • Vendor findings should have risk ratings, owners, remediation, and evidence.

  • Residual risk should be explicitly determined.

  • Due diligence should end with a documented vendor recommendation.

  • GRC converts vendor claims into evidence-based risk decisions.

Before continuing, make sure you can answer:

  1. What is vendor due diligence?

  2. How is due diligence different from vendor risk management?

  3. Why should due diligence be risk-based?

  4. What is an inherent risk assessment?

  5. Why is a questionnaire insufficient by itself?

  6. What makes strong vendor evidence?

  7. Why does evidence freshness matter?

  8. What IAM controls should be reviewed?

  9. What should be assessed in vendor vulnerability management?

  10. What evidence can support penetration testing?

  11. What should be reviewed in a secure SDLC?

  12. Why does vendor logging matter?

  13. What should be reviewed in incident response?

  14. Why should RTO and RPO be compared with business requirements?

  15. What privacy areas should due diligence cover?

  16. Why must subprocessors be identified?

  17. What is a CUEC?

  18. What should be reviewed in a SOC 2 report?

  19. How should an ISO certificate be validated?

  20. What additional considerations apply to AI vendors?

  21. What is residual vendor risk?

  22. What are the main risk-treatment options?

  23. What is a compensating control?

  24. When should risk acceptance be used?

  25. What are possible vendor recommendation outcomes?

  26. Why should critical conditions be separated into pre-contract and pre-production actions?

  27. What belongs in a due diligence evidence pack?

  28. What should happen when a vendor cannot provide evidence?

  29. Why is due diligence an iterative process?

  30. What role does GRC play in vendor due diligence?

➡️ Next: 03 — Supplier Security

In the next lesson, you will move from assessing whether a vendor has an acceptable control environment to understanding how organizations define and enforce security requirements for suppliers throughout the relationship.

You will examine:

Supplier Classification
Security Requirements
Access Requirements
Data Protection
Secure Development
Incident Obligations
Business Continuity
Contractual Security
Supplier Monitoring
Security Findings
Remediation
Ongoing Assurance

You will also build practical artifacts including a Supplier Security Standard, Supplier Security Requirements Matrix, Supplier Access Register, Supplier Data Protection Checklist, Contract Security Schedule, Supplier Incident Requirements, Supplier Assurance Tracker, and Supplier Security Dashboard.